PUBLIC DEBATE PROGRAM

Worldwide Public Speaking and Argumentation Training

The Public Debate Program (PDP) is a national and international educational outreach initiative offering class and contest opportunities primarily directed to young adolescents, students from 10 to 18 years (5th grade to 12th grade, US). The PDP is centered at the Claremont Colleges Debate Union, a co-curricular program of Claremont McKenna College in Claremont, California.

Join Now


Partner schools participate in tournament competitions, teacher workshops, judge certification training, and other sponsored academic and professional events. MS/HSPDP schools have access to online debate curricular materials and additional resources. Students may participate in additional activities, including international competition, educational exchanges, essay conferences, and leadership seminars. 

Contact john.meany@cmc.edu and mkurkhill23@cmc.edu to start or join a debate league!

Why PDP?


Why Debate?


Training in debate contributes to the intellectual and ethical development of students by challenging them to investigate complex issues, question given assumptions, evaluate the reliability of data, and consider alternative perspectives to arrive at defensible judgments. These skills, in combination with the sophisticated research and analysis skills generated by debating, develop leadership, self-reliance, and teamwork. Students who debate learn to organize ideas and manage complexity. This training is vital for effective leadership and success in secondary and post-secondary education, as well as in the professional world.

The Public Debate Program is designed to accelerate standards based learning and critical thinking. MS/HSPDP schools employ debating across the curriculum and in extra-curricular competitions; students become actively involved in their own  education. Flexible topics (pre-announced for middle school and pre-announced/impromptu for high school programming) and intensive practice mean that participation is challenging, relevant, and research-intensive. National data suggest that students struggle with writing, critical analysis, and interpretation questions during standardized assessments. These skills are learned, developed, and applied in debating.